Unit 7: Global Warfare Study Guide ─ Overview (1900-Present)
This study guide covers global conflicts from 1900 to the present, examining shifting power dynamics, the World Wars, the Cold War, and contemporary issues;
Topic 7․1: Shifting Power After 1900
Post-1900 witnessed significant power shifts, driven by internal and external factors impacting state change․ Imperial powers like Britain and France maintained holdings, yet faced anti-imperial resistance․ The collapse of empires, notably the Soviet Union (detailed in Unit 8), reshaped the global landscape․ New nations emerged, navigating challenges of independence․
Territorial continuities existed alongside conquests and treaty settlements․ Understanding these dynamics – internal pressures, external interventions, and evolving alliances – is crucial for analyzing 20th and 21st-century global warfare․
Internal and External Factors Contributing to State Change
State changes stemmed from diverse forces․ Internally, economic instability – like the Great Depression – fueled discontent and political upheaval, fostering conditions for extremist ideologies․ Externally, imperial competition, alliances (leading to WWI), and post-war treaties (Versailles) dramatically altered state structures․
Furthermore, proxy wars during the Cold War and decolonization movements reshaped national boundaries and political alignments․ These internal vulnerabilities, coupled with external pressures, consistently drove significant shifts in state power and influence throughout the period․
Continuities in Territorial Holdings (1900-Present)
Despite global conflicts, some territorial holdings persisted․ Major powers like Great Britain and France initially maintained vast colonial empires, though facing increasing anti-imperial resistance․ The United States expanded its influence, acquiring territories through treaty and conquest․ Post-WWII, while decolonization reshaped the map, certain powers retained control over strategic regions․
Furthermore, despite border adjustments, core territories of established nations generally remained intact, demonstrating a continuity in the fundamental geopolitical landscape throughout the 20th and 21st centuries․

Causes of World War I
WWI stemmed from a July Crisis, fueled by intricate alliances, Austro-Hungarian-Serbian tensions, and German ambitions, ultimately escalating into a global conflict․
The July Crisis and the Outbreak of War
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand ignited the July Crisis, a month of diplomatic failures․ Austria-Hungary, backed by Germany, issued an ultimatum to Serbia, deemed unacceptable․ Russia mobilized to support Serbia, triggering Germany’s declaration of war on Russia and subsequently, France․
Germany’s invasion of neutral Belgium prompted Great Britain’s entry, escalating a regional dispute into a widespread European war․ This chain reaction, driven by pre-existing alliances and nationalistic fervor, swiftly plunged Europe into the First World War, demonstrating the fragility of peace․
Alliances and Entanglements
A complex web of alliances significantly contributed to the outbreak of World War I․ The Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy – though Italy later switched sides) faced the Triple Entente (France, Russia, Great Britain)․ These agreements, intended to maintain peace, ironically escalated a localized conflict․
Nationalistic ambitions and imperial rivalries fueled these entanglements․ Obligations to defend allies meant a single event – the assassination – rapidly drew multiple nations into war, transforming a regional crisis into a global conflict․ These pre-war commitments proved inflexible and dangerous․
Serbia and Austria-Hungary
The relationship between Serbia and Austria-Hungary was fraught with tension, stemming from Austria-Hungary’s annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1908, which angered Serbian nationalists who envisioned a unified Slavic state․ This annexation fueled resentment and provided a breeding ground for revolutionary movements within Serbia, like the Black Hand․
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, by a Serbian nationalist ignited the July Crisis․ Austria-Hungary, backed by Germany, issued a harsh ultimatum to Serbia, designed to be unacceptable, ultimately leading to a declaration of war․

World War I: Global Conflict
World War I became a global conflict due to intricate alliance systems and imperial holdings, drawing nations from across the globe into a devastating, prolonged war․
Characteristics of Trench Warfare
Trench warfare defined the Western Front of World War I, characterized by complex systems of opposing trenches separated by “no man’s land․” These trenches, often extending for miles, provided limited protection against artillery fire and disease․
Life within the trenches was brutal, marked by constant danger, mud, rats, and psychological trauma․ Offensives involved massive artillery bombardments followed by infantry charges across open ground, resulting in horrific casualties with minimal territorial gains;
The static nature of trench warfare led to a prolonged stalemate, demanding innovative, yet often costly, technological advancements․
Technological Advancements in Warfare
World War I spurred rapid technological innovation in weaponry․ Machine guns dominated the battlefield, causing immense casualties․ Poison gas introduced a terrifying new dimension to warfare, though its effectiveness was limited․ Tanks were developed to overcome trench defenses, initially with limited success․
Airplanes evolved from reconnaissance tools to fighter aircraft and bombers, adding a new aerial dimension․ Submarines (U-boats) revolutionized naval warfare, threatening supply lines․ These advancements dramatically increased the scale and lethality of conflict, contributing to the war’s unprecedented devastation․
Total War and Mobilization of Societies
Both World Wars exemplified “total war,” demanding complete mobilization of resources and societies․ Governments exerted unprecedented control over economies, directing industrial production towards war efforts․ Propaganda was extensively used to maintain public support and demonize enemies․ Millions of civilians were directly involved through factory work, rationing, and civil defense․
Conscription became widespread, drafting vast numbers of men into military service․ These conflicts blurred the lines between combatants and non-combatants, impacting entire populations and reshaping societal norms․

The Interwar Period (1919-1939)
This era saw the fallout from WWI, including the Treaty of Versailles, economic instability, and the rise of extremist ideologies like fascism and totalitarianism․
The Treaty of Versailles and its Consequences
The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, formally ended World War I, but its harsh terms significantly impacted the interwar period․ Germany faced substantial territorial losses, demilitarization, and crippling reparations payments․
These punitive measures fostered resentment and economic hardship within Germany, creating fertile ground for extremist ideologies to flourish․ The treaty also redrew the map of Europe, creating new nations and exacerbating existing ethnic tensions․
Ultimately, the Treaty of Versailles failed to establish a lasting peace and contributed to the conditions that led to the outbreak of World War II․
Rise of Fascism and Totalitarianism
The interwar period witnessed the alarming rise of fascist and totalitarian regimes, particularly in Italy and Germany․ These ideologies prioritized the state over individual liberties, employing aggressive nationalism and centralized control․
Benito Mussolini’s Italy exemplified fascism, while Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany embraced a particularly virulent form of totalitarianism rooted in racial supremacy․ These regimes utilized propaganda, censorship, and violence to suppress opposition and consolidate power․
Their expansionist ambitions ultimately destabilized Europe and contributed directly to the outbreak of World War II․
Economic Instability and the Great Depression
The period following World War I was marked by significant economic instability, culminating in the devastating Great Depression of the 1930s․ The Wall Street Crash of 1929 triggered a global economic downturn, characterized by widespread unemployment, bank failures, and declining trade․
Existing economic vulnerabilities, such as war debts and unequal distribution of wealth, exacerbated the crisis․ Governments struggled to respond effectively, and the economic hardship fueled social unrest and political extremism․
This instability created fertile ground for the rise of radical ideologies․

Causes of World War II
World War II stemmed from unresolved issues post-WWI, aggressive expansionism by Germany, Italy, and Japan, appeasement failures, and the collapse of collective security․
Aggression and Expansionism (Germany, Italy, Japan)
Germany’s expansionist policies under Hitler, violating the Treaty of Versailles, fueled tensions․ This included rearmament, the Rhineland remilitarization, and Anschluss with Austria․ Italy, led by Mussolini, pursued imperial ambitions in Africa, invading Ethiopia in 1935․
Japan aggressively expanded in Asia, invading Manchuria in 1931 and initiating a full-scale war with China in 1937․ These actions demonstrated a disregard for international law and a pursuit of territorial dominance, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of global conflict․
Appeasement and Failure of Collective Security
Appeasement, exemplified by the Munich Agreement in 1938, saw Britain and France concede territory to Hitler in hopes of avoiding war․ This policy, however, emboldened further German aggression․ The League of Nations proved ineffective in preventing expansionism due to its lack of enforcement power and the absence of key nations like the United States․
The failure of collective security – a system designed to prevent aggression through joint action – demonstrated the fragility of international cooperation in the face of rising nationalism and expansionist ambitions, paving the way for WWII․
The Road to War in Europe and Asia
In Europe, Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy, including remilitarization of the Rhineland and annexation of Austria, escalated tensions․ The invasion of Poland in September 1939 finally triggered declarations of war from France and Britain․
In Asia, Japan pursued a policy of expansionism, invading Manchuria in 1931 and launching a full-scale invasion of China in 1937․ This expansion, coupled with resource needs and imperial ambitions, led to conflict with the United States after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941․

World War II: A Global Conflict
World War II encompassed major theaters in Europe, the Pacific, and North Africa, marked by key battles and horrific atrocities like the Holocaust, reshaping the world․
Major Theaters of War (Europe, Pacific, North Africa)
The European Theater witnessed intense fighting across multiple fronts, including the Eastern Front’s brutal clashes and the Western Front’s D-Day landings․ The Pacific Theater was characterized by island-hopping campaigns and naval warfare between the US and Japan․
North Africa served as a crucial battleground for control of resources and strategic locations, involving Allied and Axis forces․ Each theater presented unique challenges, impacting the war’s overall trajectory and demanding diverse military strategies․ These diverse fronts demonstrate the truly global scale of the conflict․
Key Battles and Turning Points
The Battle of Stalingrad marked a crucial turning point on the Eastern Front, halting German advances and initiating a Soviet counteroffensive․ The Battle of Midway in the Pacific decisively shifted naval power towards the United States, crippling the Japanese fleet․
D-Day, the Allied invasion of Normandy, opened a second front in Europe, accelerating Germany’s defeat․ These battles, alongside others, represent pivotal moments that dramatically altered the course of World War II, influencing its ultimate outcome and reshaping the global landscape․
The Holocaust and Other Atrocities
The Holocaust, the systematic genocide of European Jews by the Nazi regime, stands as a horrific example of state-sponsored mass murder, resulting in the deaths of six million․ Unit 743, a Japanese biological warfare unit, conducted gruesome experiments on prisoners of war and civilians, demonstrating wartime brutality․
These atrocities, alongside the Nanjing Massacre and the Armenian Genocide, represent profound moral failures and underscore the devastating consequences of unchecked hatred and ideological extremism during global conflict․

The Cold War (1947-1991)
The Cold War was a geopolitical struggle between the US and Soviet Union, characterized by proxy wars, the nuclear arms race, and ideological conflict․
Origins of the Cold War
Post-World War II tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union quickly escalated, forming the basis of the Cold War․ Ideological differences – capitalism versus communism – fueled mutual distrust․ The Soviet Union’s expansion of influence in Eastern Europe, establishing satellite states, alarmed the West․
Furthermore, disagreements over the future of Germany and differing visions for postwar Europe contributed to the growing divide․ The development and use of atomic weapons by the US also heightened anxieties within the Soviet Union, initiating a dangerous arms race․
Proxy Wars and Conflicts (Korea, Vietnam)
The Cold War rarely involved direct conflict between the US and USSR, instead manifesting as proxy wars․ The Korean War (1950-1953) saw US-led UN forces clash with communist North Korea, backed by China and the Soviet Union․ Similarly, the Vietnam War (1955-1975) pitted communist North Vietnam against South Vietnam, supported by the United States․
These conflicts were driven by the domino theory – the fear of communism spreading – and became battlegrounds for ideological struggle, resulting in immense human cost and regional instability․
Nuclear Arms Race and Mutually Assured Destruction
The Cold War fueled a relentless nuclear arms race between the US and USSR, escalating fears of global annihilation․ Both superpowers developed increasingly powerful nuclear weapons and delivery systems, leading to a dangerous buildup of arsenals․ This competition birthed the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)․
MAD posited that any nuclear attack would inevitably trigger a retaliatory strike, resulting in the complete destruction of both attacker and defender, effectively deterring a first strike and maintaining a fragile peace․

Decolonization and New Nations
Post-World War II saw widespread decolonization, with independence movements gaining momentum across Africa and Asia, creating numerous new nations facing unique challenges․
Post-War Independence Movements
Following WWII, a surge of independence movements reshaped the global landscape․ Colonial empires weakened, fostering nationalist sentiments in territories across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East․ Leaders like Gandhi in India employed non-violent resistance, while others utilized armed struggle․
These movements were fueled by a desire for self-determination and rejection of colonial rule․ The United Nations played a role, advocating for decolonization․ However, the process wasn’t always peaceful, often marked by conflict and political instability as new nations emerged․
Challenges Faced by Newly Independent States
Newly independent states confronted immense challenges post-colonization․ Establishing stable governments proved difficult, often plagued by ethnic tensions and political infighting inherited from arbitrarily drawn colonial boundaries․ Economic dependence on former colonial powers persisted, hindering true self-sufficiency․
Infrastructure was often lacking, and education systems were underdeveloped․ The Cold War further complicated matters, as superpowers vied for influence, sometimes supporting authoritarian regimes․ Navigating these internal and external pressures was crucial for long-term success․

The Non-Aligned Movement
The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) emerged as a powerful force during the Cold War, offering a third path for newly independent nations․ Founded in 1961, NAM aimed to avoid alignment with either the United States or the Soviet Union, promoting peaceful coexistence and international cooperation․
Key leaders like Nehru, Tito, and Nasser championed sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference․ NAM provided a platform for these nations to advocate for their interests and challenge the bipolar world order, fostering solidarity and collective action․

Globalization and Contemporary Conflicts
Globalization’s rise fuels new conflicts, including terrorism and asymmetric warfare, alongside humanitarian crises․ Multinational corporations and global trade reshape power dynamics worldwide․
Rise of Multinational Corporations and Global Trade
The post-World War II era witnessed a dramatic expansion of multinational corporations (MNCs), significantly altering global economic landscapes; Increased international trade, facilitated by reduced tariffs and advancements in transportation, fostered interconnectedness․
MNCs gained immense power, influencing national economies and sometimes challenging state sovereignty․ This economic globalization, while boosting prosperity in some regions, also created inequalities and vulnerabilities․
The rise of global supply chains and financial flows further integrated nations, but also amplified the potential for economic shocks to spread rapidly across borders, impacting stability․
Terrorism and Asymmetric Warfare
The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw the rise of terrorism as a prominent form of asymmetric warfare, challenging traditional state-based conflict․ Non-state actors, employing violence against civilian and military targets, aimed to achieve political or ideological goals․
Asymmetric warfare, characterized by imbalances in power, favored tactics like guerrilla warfare, sabotage, and cyberattacks․
The 9/11 attacks exemplified this shift, leading to the “War on Terror” and prolonged military interventions, reshaping global security strategies and raising complex ethical dilemmas․
Contemporary Conflicts and Humanitarian Crises
The 21st century witnesses numerous ongoing conflicts, often fueled by ethnic tensions, resource scarcity, and political instability, resulting in severe humanitarian crises․ Conflicts in regions like Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine demonstrate the devastating impact on civilian populations․
These crises generate mass displacement, famine, and widespread human rights abuses, demanding international intervention and aid․
Challenges include navigating complex geopolitical landscapes, ensuring aid access, and addressing the root causes of conflict to foster lasting peace and stability․
